Re: [Gimp-user] Why so COMPLICATED?
- From: "Joao S. O. Bueno" <gwidion mpc com br>
- To: Richard <strata_ranger hotmail com>
- Cc: "gimp-user-list gnome org" <gimp-user-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Why so COMPLICATED?
- Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 17:09:00 -0200
On 28 December 2013 16:15, Richard <strata_ranger hotmail com> wrote:
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 12:37:37 +0100
From: ofnuts laposte net
To: gimp-user-list gnome org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Why so COMPLICATED?
This question has been asked elsewhere. A solution is to paste the full
object to a new layer, add a layer mask, fill the shape with a shaped
gradient (which is a function of the distance to the outline) and then
use the Brightess/Contrast (2 sliders), Levels (5 sliders), or Curves
(256 sliders) to adjust the blend.
On a tangent, you just pointed out the biggest flaw with shaped gradients: You can't specify a gradient
length. What's the point of even having it without that functionality? I'd get faster (more precise,
controllable, etc.) results by brushing the edges by hand.
-- Stratadrake
strata_ranger hotmail com
--------------------
Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.
_______________________________________________
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address: gimp-user-list gnome org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]