...like how layer groups don't have a fixed size and their width/height are automatically derived from the size/placement of their constituent layers?
There would be an easy workaround if only we had a "Multiply with alpha" layer blending mode so I could put a white masking layer at the top of the group's layer stack ... but we don't have that, either. -- Stratadrake strata_ranger hotmail com -------------------- Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth. > Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:46:45 +0200 > From: simon budig de > To: gimp-user-list gnome org > Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] alpha channels vs masks > > Richard Gitschlag (strata_ranger hotmail com) wrote: > > Finally ... well, it seems that you can't actually add a layer mask to > > a layer group as a whole. I don't see why not though - that would > > give the ability to mask off a group of layers all at once. > > ...because mitch discovered a nasty bug with this and this has not been > fixed yet... > > Bye, > Simon > > -- > simon budig de http://simon.budig.de/ > _______________________________________________ > gimp-user-list mailing list > gimp-user-list gnome org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list |