Re: [Gimp-user] File format question
- From: Psiweapon <psiweapon gmail com>
- To: gimp-user-list gnome org, Juan Olvido <juan olvido gmail com>, christenanderson1994 gmail com
- Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] File format question
- Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 18:01:01 +0200
Hey thanks for the link!
I think I understood it. It's elitist, politicky crap, although an excess of vodka can't be ruled out with current evidence.
I guess I'll be adding my transparencies with Graphics Gale unless I totally need to use a RGB PNG for partial transparencies or whatever.
Good going for gimp, that move is very low-end user friendly. I guess the developers that introduced that now feel all special and 1337, with their program
officially importing standard formats - also adds a lot of flexibility.
The "you can't use this dialog anymore, go through the service door you loser" is also really helpful and fun.
Thanks for your time!
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Christen Anderson
<christenanderson1994 gmail com> wrote:
On 9/9/2012 9:05 AM, Psiweapon wrote:
Hey there, I'm a newcomer, although I've been using
Gimp for some years now (nothing advanced though)
Exactly WHY or WHO the HELL thought it was a good idea to leave
common image formats (.png, .gif, etc.) out of the "save" menu in
2.8????
Was this decision taken because of legal issues, politicky crap,
too much vodka, or what the fuck? Could anybody enlighten me,
please?
Thank you for your time.
http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/Save_%2B_export_specification
_______________________________________________
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]