Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP Git gimp_too_cursors_get_resource error MacOS

[Michael Natterer <mitch gimp org>]

On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 06:36 -0400, Partha Bagchi wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 2:56 AM Michael Natterer <mitch gimp org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2018-06-07 at 11:28 -0400, Partha Bagchi wrote:
> > > I get the following:
> > >
> > > Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
> > >   "_gimp_tool_cursors_get_resource", referenced from:
> > >      -u command line option
> > > ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
> > > clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to
> > > see
> > > invocation)
> > > make[3]: *** [gimp-console-2.99] Error 1
> > >
> > >
> > > This is due to this line in ./app/Makefile
> > >
> > > #\
> > > # -Wl,-u,$(SYMPREFIX)gimp_tool_cursors_get_resource
> > >
> > >
> > > I think this should not be there. After I comment it out, it
> > > compiles
> > > normally.
> >
> > But you probably have no cursors :)
>
> How do I verify that? Wouldn't I have had this issue when I was
> compiling
> GIMP 2.10? Little confused. :)

Cursor resource genration was changed in master, we now generate
them in the directory where they are compiled , but they have
to be linked in by force because nothing in the source references
the symbol.

Just check if you tools have different cursors.

> > The symbol must be there is the resource file was properly
> > generated.
>
> I assume the resource file is ./app/widgets/gimp-tool-cursors.c? This
> file
> is identical to GIMP-2.10/cursors/gimp-tool-cursors.c. So, does that
> mean
> it was generated properly?
>
> I also noticed that GIMP 2.10 Makfile.am didn't include that line
> while
> GIMP 2.99.1 does.
>
> > --Mitch
>
> Thanks,
> Partha