Re: [Gimp-developer] Artifacts after scaling, rotation... in 2.9 git

[Alexander Rabtchevich <alexander v rabtchevich gmx net>]

Because of the size. It seems the whole letter size should be smaller 
than 40k. It will be easier to use external links.

The original tiff
https://yadi.sk/i/J1bi__FhcKvUJ


The result of image resizing to 1600 pixels with nohalo.
https://yadi.sk/i/bLjZia4ccKtHK

Mint 17 x64, mate, AMD Phenom II X6 1075T Processor, 12 Gb RAM, built-in 
Radeon HD 4290 (no OpenCl).

With respect,
Alexander Rabtchevich

Paka wrote:
> * Alexander Rabtchevich <alexander v rabtchevich gmx net> [10-27-14 12:40]:
> > I guess the enclosure were deleted. Here is the smaller file (jpg). I
> > can upload the original tiff to the internet to reproduce my actions.
> >
> > With respect,
> > Alexander Rabtchevich
> >
> > Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
> > >
> > > > Here is an example after scaling (a crop from the image).
> > > Where? :)
> > >
> > > Alex
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gimp-developer-list mailing list
> > > List address:    gimp-developer-list gnome org
> > > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
> > > List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
> > _______________________________________________
> > gimp-developer-list mailing list
> > List address:    gimp-developer-list gnome org
> > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
> > List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
> so if "enclosures" are deleted, why do you expect a "smaller file" to
> survive?