Re: [Gimp-developer] XCF format specification

[Michael Schumacher <schumaml gmx de>]

On 17.06.2014 20:36, scl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in order to fix [bug 730211] I came across the
> [XCF file format specification]. While the XCF format
> has been in production use for years the spec is still
> marked as draft.

The document has been created because someone (iirc a third party)
considered "it is undocumented to discourage use by other applications"
insufficient.

> Which parts of the spec have become mandatory in between?
> What do we need to clarify that still justifies the draft state?

I'm not sure if it ever left draft status, and it seems like others on
IRC are neither.

> [bug 730211]:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730211

And we're not sure how it is going to help with that?

-- 
Regards,
Michael
GPG: 96A8 B38A 728A 577D 724D 60E5 F855 53EC B36D 4CDD