Re: [Gimp-developer] Gaussian/Tileable blur: Choice of IIR and RLE still necessary?
- From: Liam R E Quin <liam holoweb net>
- To: gg <gg catking net>
- Cc: gimp-developer-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Gaussian/Tileable blur: Choice of IIR and RLE still necessary?
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:11:36 -0400
On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 11:49 +0200, gg wrote:
> "With modern computers" argument is countered by "on modern images". As
> the hardware gets faster the images also get bigger ( in both x and y) .
> As gimp progresses to higher bit resolutions any difference may become
> more relevant not less.
I just compared the two methods and found RLE tool about 10 or 11
seconds and IIR took maybe 19 seconds on the same image with the same
radius (2.5p I think).
Liam
--
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
Co-author, 5th editoin of "Beginning XML", Wrox, July 2012
[Date Prev][
Date Next] [Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]