Re: [Gimp-developer] Bug 155733 - discussion of approach (bug: need to check return values of gimp_drawable_mask_bounds())

[gg catking net]

On 01/03/12 01:09, Neil wrote:
> Hi...
> Am just getting started with gimp hacking, and decided to pick a
> gnome-love bug to have a look at :)
>
> I have a fairly clear idea of how to fix plugins which don't have any
> dialog box - they should just basically do nothing at all, and exit
> silently. (I'd have thought they ought to take the first opportunity to
> exit; I'm not sure this is true of the already-fixed ones but that's not
> the current issue.)
>
> For plugins with dialog boxes, things are less obvious. I chose "grid"
> to look at first. I could change it in the fashion suggested in the
> bugzilla discussion, so that instead of calling
> gimp_drawable_mask_bounds() it calls gimp_drawable_mask_intersect() and
> checks the return value. However, this would still run the dialog, with
> a (totally spurious) preview. To me, it would make far more sense to
> bail out before the dialog is even called. However, when I had a look at
> blur_gauss.c, which is already fixed (i.e. it calls
> gimp_drawable_mask_intersect()), I saw that it does allow the plugin
> dialog to run.
> In contrast, iwarp bails out immediately, with a warning that the
> affected region is empty (in a status bar below the image window).
>
> I was tempted to infer that blur_gauss was fixed in a really minimalist
> way (just to avoid nasty stuff happening, e.g. crashes) while leaving
> the code in a slightly icky state (i.e. the dialog box running even
> though it can't do anything at all to the image), while iwarp was fixed
> in a "better" way. However, when I look at the git commit attributed to
> Luidnel Maignan (9b6c9e1fe4f46d2d47c6d97d4147cf060abd07f8) I can see
> that *both* approaches were used (iwarp was fixed in this patch, and a
> bunch of others too). So I'm confused!
>
> Some guidance on which approach is best (and why) would be welcome...
>
> ta
> Neil
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-developer-list mailing list
> gimp-developer-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list

I seem to recall posting to this list , a couple of weeks back that 
Enhance | Sharpen was effectively not doing anything , maybe this one 
has been "fixed" as well ??

/gg