Re: [Gegl-developer] Returning to python-gegl

[jcupitt gmail com]

On 12 February 2015 at 16:30, Joao S. O. Bueno <gwidion mpc com br> wrote:
> Otherwise, I think I will rewire the python bindings using another
> method to bridge to the C library, which is more predictive and better
> supported.

I've made a Python binding for my largish C library using
gobject-introspection and not had any serious problems. It was a bit
wonky a year or so ago, but it honestly seems OK now. Performance is
good too, and I don't see any memory leaks. I'm very grateful for it.

I've been trying to make a Ruby binding in the same way and oh dear oh
dear it's a lot harder :(

John