Re: [gedit-list] GtkSourceCompletion

[Jesse van den Kieboom <jessevdk gnome org>]

perriman wrote:
> Thanks Paolo for the response,
>
> 	I'm thinking in change the library to support multiple editors and we
> could use it in anjuta for GTV/GSV/scintilla or another widget we want.
> I will add the integration changes in the library but in a "editor
> independent" way. Ideas/suggestions are welcome.
>   
I have been working on the next revision including the latest concepts 
and I think we are getting close. You can find the work on 
'http://github.com/jessevdk/gtksourceview/tree/gtksourcecompletion'.

With regard on a separate library, it would be somewhat counter 
productive to keep two separate versions of essentially the same thing 
(if there are any API differences, that would make it even worse). I'm 
not sure if it is worth the effort, considering that most of these 
editors will probably already have solutions for this on their own, and 
we might better focus our efforts on making a kick-ass, all around 
source code widget instead.


Jesse
> Regards,
> 	Perriman
>
>
> El sáb, 29-08-2009 a las 12:37 +0200, Paolo Borelli escribió:
>   
> > On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 21:21 +0200, perriman wrote:
> >     
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > 	I'll reopen the GtkSourceCompletion library again while the gedit team
> > > decide include a completion solution to gtksourceview. I will not
> > > develop more changes in the gtksourceview repository and the new changes
> > > will be do it in the GtkSourceCompletion library. My gedit plugins will
> > > be developed using the GtkSourceCompletion library too because we go
> > > very slow in the gsc and gsv integration and I don't get the feedback I
> > > want to continue with the integration. I know you are very busy and you
> > > can do what you want but I cannot wait to the integration and I need to
> > > advance.
> > >
> > >       
> > Hi Perriman,
> >
> > 	I am obviously very sorry that we were not able to finish the
> > integration and I think your choice to restart development of the
> > separate library is a good choice for now. We'll see if in the next
> > cycle things will go better, but in the mean time having the code out
> > and used is definitely a good thing.
> > My only suggestion is to keep using a separate prefix for the function
> > names and where possible to use in gtksourcecompletion the changes that
> > were made while working on the integration this cycle.
> >
> > Thanks for all your work,
> >
> > 	Paolo
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     
> > > Thanks a lot for your effort!!!
> > >
> > > Perriman
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gedit-list mailing list
> > > gedit-list gnome org
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gedit-list
> > >
> > >       
>
> _______________________________________________
> gedit-list mailing list
> gedit-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gedit-list
>