Re: [gdome]more memory leaks
- From: Paolo Casarini <casarini CS UniBO IT>
- To: Tobias Peters <t-peters gmx de>
- Cc: gdome gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gdome]more memory leaks
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 09:35:06 +0100 (CET)
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Tobias Peters wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to test if nodes that are not attached to the document (but
> belong to a document, e.g. just created with Document::createElement) are
> also deleted when the tree is freed; with the help of the memory debugging
> tool that comes with the gnu C library. But I did not come so far, because
> even the following simple program leaks memory:
>
> --test.c----------
> #include <gdome.h>
> #include <mcheck.h>
> int main() {
> GdomeDOMImplementation *di;
> GdomeDOMString *name;
> GdomeDocument *doc;
> GdomeException exc = 0;
>
> mtrace(); /* start memory debugging */
>
> di = gdome_di_mkref();
> name = gdome_str_mkref ("ex");
>
> /* comment out the following 2 lines to get rid of the memory leak */
> doc = gdome_di_createDocument(di, NULL, name, NULL, &exc);
> gdome_doc_unref(doc, &exc);
> /**/
>
> gdome_str_unref(name);
> gdome_di_unref(di, &exc);
> return 0;
> }
> -----------------------
>
> to compile, run, and evaluate the memory trace I do the following
> $ export MALLOC_TRACE=/tmp/mtrace
> $ gcc -o test test.c -g `gdome-config --cflags --libs`
> $ ./test
>
> ** WARNING **: GDOME-TREEGC: Free libxml2 DOM tree
> $ mtrace ./test /tmp/mtrace
> Memory not freed:
> -----------------
> Address Size Caller
> 0x08049ac8 0x14 at 0x4007044f
> 0x08049ae0 0x1e at 0x400703f9
> 0x08049b08 0x34 at 0x400703f9
> 0x08049b40 0x400 at 0x400703f9
> 0x08049fa0 0x1c at 0x400703f9
>
> As stated in the source, there is no memory leak when the calls to
> gdome_di_createDocument and gdome_doc_unref are not performed.
Fixed on CVS.
Thanx,
paolo.
--
Paolo Casarini - casarini cs unibo it
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]