Re: [gdome]LGPL? (fwd)

[Paolo Casarini <casarini CS UniBO IT>]

With regard to the answer of Mathieu on my question about changing the
license of Gdome2 from GPL to LGPL, I forward the mail I've received from
Raph. 

Wainting Mathieu opinion,
   Paolo
--
Paolo Casarini - casarini cs unibo it

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:05:54 -0700
From: Raph Levien <raph levien com>
To: Paolo Casarini <casarini CS UniBO IT>
Subject: Re: [gdome]LGPL?

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 08:52:56PM +0200, Paolo Casarini wrote:
> 
> On 12 Jun 2001, Murray Cumming wrote:
> 
> > GDome seems to be licensed under the GPL. Why not license it under the LGPL,
> > which is used by the rest of the GNOME libraries. Surely, a GPL library can
> > not be used by a LGPL library, such as those GNOME libraries.
> When I start working on Gdome2 it was under GPL and it is still under
> it. I want that Gdome2 is a LGPL library but I think I can't modify
> the today situation without the consent of all previously authors of this
> library.
> 
> To Raph, Daniel, Mathieu, Anders: Are you agree to change the license of
> Gdome2 from GPL to LGPL?

I have no objections.

Raph