Re: [gdome]LGPL? (fwd)

[Mathieu Lacage <mathieu gnu org>]

On 12 Jun 2001 21:43:35 +0200, Paolo Casarini wrote:
> With regard to the answer of Mathieu on my question about changing the
> license of Gdome2 from GPL to LGPL, I forward the mail I've received from
> Raph. 


eeeew. I am impressed. You suceeded at getting an email answer from raph
:)

well done, paolo :)

Mathieu



> 
> Wainting Mathieu opinion,
>    Paolo
> --
> Paolo Casarini - casarini cs unibo it
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:05:54 -0700
> From: Raph Levien <raph levien com>
> To: Paolo Casarini <casarini CS UniBO IT>
> Subject: Re: [gdome]LGPL?
> 
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 08:52:56PM +0200, Paolo Casarini wrote:
> > 
> > On 12 Jun 2001, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > 
> > > GDome seems to be licensed under the GPL. Why not license it under the LGPL,
> > > which is used by the rest of the GNOME libraries. Surely, a GPL library can
> > > not be used by a LGPL library, such as those GNOME libraries.
> > When I start working on Gdome2 it was under GPL and it is still under
> > it. I want that Gdome2 is a LGPL library but I think I can't modify
> > the today situation without the consent of all previously authors of this
> > library.
> > 
> > To Raph, Daniel, Mathieu, Anders: Are you agree to change the license of
> > Gdome2 from GPL to LGPL?
> 
> I have no objections.
> 
> Raph
> 
--
Mathieu Lacage <mathieu gnu org>
Portable: <lacage itineris net>