Re: [gdm-list] xsession-errors
- From: "Ray Strode" <halfline gmail com>
- To: "Brian Cameron" <Brian Cameron sun com>
- Cc: gdm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gdm-list] xsession-errors
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:26:48 -0500
Hi,
> - Bug 419085 - Running Xnest stomps your .xsession-errors file. Perhaps
> it makes sense to append the $DISPLAY value to the filename if the
> value is not ":0" or something?
Or we could skip the ftruncate call when doing an Xnest session.
Or maybe lock the file and if it fails to lock then fall back to
~/.xsession-errors:$DISPLAY
> - Bug 459293 - Some ideas about dealing with file limits.
those limits shouldn't be a factor anymore since we aren't proxying the messages
> - Bug 493737 - Support a fifo instead of a file for .xsession-errors.
Hmm, right now I explicitly discard the file if it's not a regular
file. It might be okay to change that I guess.
> I like the fact that this is simple. Is there nothing that can be
> done to limit its size?
I don't believe so (well without resorting to proxying schemes)
> I guess this depends on how this is implemented.
>
> With GDM 2.20 and earlier, I notice that warnings from programs
> launched from the panel don't get logged in this file. Some GTK+
> based programs spew lots of warnings. If we rewrite this so that
> programs launched from the panel get logged here, then it might
> grow large - especially for users who leave a session running for
> a long time.
I guess it's up to the panel to decide what children get access to the file.
Even so though, it would take a considerably long time to fill up the
file. Say the per-file limit was an absurdly low 1mb. at 80 x 24
bytes per page, we're looking at ~500 pages of of solid warnings
before we hit 1mb.
> I'd say that a simple approach makes sense. If users end up
> complaining about problems, we can always add more smarts to how
> this works later.
Yea, definitely.
--Ray
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]