Re: GConf design goals.
- From: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Colm Smyth <Colm Smyth Sun COM>, bje apnic net, gconf-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GConf design goals.
- Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2001 09:49:31 +0100
Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com> writes:
> > The difference is that only bonobo-conf programs can access those
> > values if I decode everything into a string. Else every program can
> > access/modify those values.
> Why? Any program can call corba_any_to_string() and vice versa.
Only programs that use bonobo-conf, since corba_any_to_string() is part
But yes, you are right and the two solutions are functional equivalent.
You consider the whole thing as "syntactic sugar", and you think the most
important thing is to simply provide a working solution. IMO there are
some more criteria's to rate the quality of software, so even "syntactic
sugar" counts (for me).
] [Thread Prev