Re: GConf editor tool

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Erik Johnsson <zaphod linux nu> writes:
> 
> I don't really know anything about this, but isn't there a problem with
> writing a GConf editor in C++? I thought that GNOME was supposed to be
> written in C for portability. This was probably just the core libraries,
> but some might argue that core programs (like gconf-editor) should
> also be written in C. Or has this changed?
> 

C++ can be portable enough, see AbiWord, Mozilla, both of which are
more portable than GNOME. It's a non-issue.

Havoc