Re: RFC: The new, improved README / FAQ file

[Andre Schaefer <a schaefer uni-duisburg de>]

Murray Cumming schrieb:
> On Mon, 2004-05-10 at 10:26 +0200, Andre Schaefer wrote:
>
> > Also, I like the section about GCC 2.95 problems. But, what I never 
> > understood: Is there any way to build the current C++ bindings with the 
> > old GCC?
>
>
> No, not unless someone finds a way to patch it to do that.

OK - were are close to a debian sarge transition here in our workgroup, 
so I do not intend to try. Especially as I do not seem to miss much ath 
the moment, without the bindings. Just a personal view on this.

> > Is this sane at all? I never filed bugs against that, as I felt 
> > it cannot be done. So I just moved the bindings/*mm* packages to broken 
>
>
> The bindings are not broken. g++ 2.95 is broken.

No pun intended. I only wanted them out of my way and keep garnome running.

* André