Re: autogen: USE_GNOME2_MACROS, USE_COMMON_DOC_BUILD
- From: Christian Persch <chpe gnome org>
- To: "Thomas H.P. Andersen" <phomes gmail com>
- Cc: Gnome Games list <games-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: autogen: USE_GNOME2_MACROS, USE_COMMON_DOC_BUILD
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:28:59 +0100
Hi;
Am Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:09:04 +0100
schrieb "Thomas H.P. Andersen" <phomes gmail com>:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 19:32, Christian Persch <chpe gnome org>
> wrote:
> > Am Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:01:38 +0100
> > schrieb "Thomas H.P. Andersen" <phomes gmail com>:
> >> I was wondering why we keep omf.make and xmldocs.make around while
> >> most other modules use USE_COMMON_DOC_BUILD=yes instead. Is there
> >> a specific reason or was the transition just never done?
> >
> > I guess that's it, yes. These are for the old-style docs, btw, so
> > maybe we can just finally remove those few docs translations that
> > haven't upgraded to gnome-doc-utils yet?
>
> What defines an old-style doc? I tried looking around but they all
> look the same to me :)
They were the ones that had an entry in SUBDIRS in */help/Makefile.am.
Looking for them now, it appears they're _already_ all gone, so you can
just git remove xmldocs.make and omf.make (also from toplevel
Makefile.am).
Regards,
Christian
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]