Re: FOSDEM Desktops DevRoom 2016 Call for Participation
- From: Alexandre Franke <alexandre franke gmail com>
- To: foundation-list <foundation-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: FOSDEM Desktops DevRoom 2016 Call for Participation
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 22:21:27 +0100
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
<zeeshanak gnome org> wrote:
Yeah I understand that but I'm wondering if they could be persuaded
not to treat all applying projects equally and give more room and time
to projects that are more popular/bigger. I didn't want to say bad of
any projects in particular here but I feel I have to give an example,
to make my point so I'll mention one that I actually love: Guile.
Given that there is a handful of people who use Guile (or even Scheme
in general), I really don't see why it should be given the same amount
of room/time as GNOME and KDE.
We were also allocated a single table instead of the usual two we get
to make room for more projects. See it this way: the ones you call
bigger projects usually have the means to hold at least one yearly
conference on their own. The smaller ones don't get to meet that
often. Also they really need the exposure FOSDEM provides them, and as
you say the bigger projects are already popular. If the Guile people
don't have a talk at FOSDEM, where would they have it?
--
Alexandre Franke
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]