On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 12:08 -0400, john palmieri wrote: > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad behdad org> wrote: > [...] > I was on that board and I can back up Behdad's statement here. The > change in wording from 1 year to a range between 1 and 2 years has > already been done unchallenged (though someone could have rightfully > challenged it at the time) and this change is simply putting into > effect wording in our bylaws that would allow it without a vote. It > allows the board to be more flexible based on issues we have dealt > with in the past but in practice we would rarely go beyond a 1 year > term. I believe pursuant to the document any member who can get 10% > support can always challenge the extension of the term period before > the elections if they wish. Also being that this is a per election > decision that can't be amended without a vote during the term, there > is little chance for abuse. > [...] Thanks Behdad and John for the clarifications. -- Germán Póo-Caamaño http://people.gnome.org/~gpoo/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part