Re: GNOME Quarterly Reports

On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net> wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 12:45 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
>> On 12/15/2012 04:47 PM, Andre Klapper wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 20:40 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
>> >> As feedback is often slow (needs several times of nagging) I'd like to
>> >> know if quarterly reports are still supported and wanted by the
>> >> community, or if we should think of a better format (e.g. merging with
>> >> news or journal activities).
>> >
>> > No answers, so I guess there is no interest.
>> I don't think that's a fair assumption. Perhaps it means our current way
>> of doing them is not successful, and we need to try something else.
> We should try, and you've made good proposals in the past.
> I'd be happy to see them discussed, together with the responsibility of
> leading such efforts.

I think making Quarterly Reports more interesting & accessible makes a
 lot of sense - whether that means rolling them into a magazine-type
 feature, or something else I'm not sure. Essentially making them less
 technical so that people outside the community find them interesting
 and worth reading. Right now, I wonder how many people read them -
 they were a great help in putitng the annual report together last
 year, but otherwise don't seem to be read or used by much of anyone.


> andre
> --
> Andre Klapper  |  ak-47 gmx net
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-list mailing list
> foundation-list gnome org

Whatever you can do, or dream you can, begin it. Boldness has genius,
power and magic in it. -  Goethe

Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't
matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr.Seuss

Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that
counts can be counted. - Albert Einstein

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]