Re: Thanks, and a Brief Survey
- From: Philip Van Hoof <pvanhoof gnome org>
- To: Ciaran O'Riordan <ciaran member fsf org>
- Cc: Luis Villa <luis tieguy org>, foundation-list gnome org, Richard Stallman <rms gnu org>
- Subject: Re: Thanks, and a Brief Survey
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:55:18 +0100
On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 22:52 +0000, Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:
[CUT]
> The last few mails in this thread suggest that people are happy with this
> aspect of GNOME's philosophy. So it's something worth maintaining. How do
> we ensure that newcomers see the philosophy and the reasons for avoiding or
> rewriting non-free/non-open-source software?
> Using the term "free software" helps because it leads people to make a
> connection with a philosophy that answers exactly that question. Other
> helpful measures can include more prominently displaying the fact that GNOME
> insists on freedom, and explanations of why software freedom is valuable.
As the GNOME community's values have a strong ethical ground, I question
the necessity of the FSF's philosophical help.
I believe the insinuation that we do is misplaced.
[CUT]
--
Philip Van Hoof, freelance software developer
home: me at pvanhoof dot be
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
http://pvanhoof.be/blog
http://codeminded.be
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]