Re: Thanks, and a Brief Survey

[Philip Van Hoof <pvanhoof gnome org>]

On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 11:05 -0500, john palmieri wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Philip Van Hoof <pvanhoof gnome org>
> wrote:
>         On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 10:37 -0500, john palmieri wrote:

> You are still implying that those who are in opposition are the
> disruptive people.  It is a blanket, emotional statement.  You could
> have simply left it with open source developers are far more pragmatic
> than some give credit for.

No because the survey's importance for me is to illustrate to the
disruptive people that they are crazy.

The opposition contains intelligent people too. I'm not referring to
them. You are trying to skew my words because it would suit you if I
would have said that. But I didn't.

I think it's clear for everybody who I mean with "disruptive people".

> Because you are pretty disrespectful in how you deal with debate, this
> is the last time I am replying to you on this thread.

Yes that's easy.

"

I disagree with him so I'm going to reply disrespectfully by trying to
skew his words and cut away the most important part of his E-mail ...

And then I will claim that HE was disrespectful and that I don't want to
talk with him anymore, that way framing the debate with misinformation.

"

Sorry John, but it's not because you use a cleaner writing style than I
do, that you aren't being disrespectful. You did cut context-relevant
sentences and you are misrepresenting what I said. You didn't even had
the respect to write a [CUT], which is netiquette.


Cheers,

-- 
Philip Van Hoof, freelance software developer
home: me at pvanhoof dot be 
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org 
http://pvanhoof.be/blog
http://codeminded.be