Re: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap
- From: Juanjo Marin <juanjomarin96 yahoo es>
- To: Ciaran O'Riordan <ciaran member fsf org>
- Cc: foundation-list <foundation-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:50:11 +0100
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 19:26 +0000, Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:
> (This is offlist, but feel free to copy/reply onlist)
>
> If you're refering to the switch of certain mobile systems from Gtk to Qt, I
> think it's a bad idea to call it a "loss". Our goal is to give software
> users freedom. With free versions of Qt, they have freedom. It's nice to
> see "our" system being used instead of any other system, and the choice of
> Qt over Gtk might indeed highlight some technical shortcomings which could
> be addressed in Gtk, but we still "win" when they use free versions of Qt.
>
> If you're refering to the fact that certain mobile devices have built their
> own proprietary systems instead of using Gtk, then I agree that this is a
> "loss".
>
Ciaran,
My post was more about the need of defining the direction where we want
to go. We need to find a way to agree on the areas to be priorized for
improvement and figure out how to do as _community_, using all our
resources. So, if, for example, we set as priority to be a serious
option for mobile computing, we need to have a plan for that (I put this
as example, surely biased for the news of today and because the
componentized idea I like very much :).
I'm happy to see that big companies choose free software, though I must
admit I'll be happier it they had choosen GNOME :) --The idea of making
components from GNOME applications could make possible to have a Qt
frontend for these applications--
Cheers,
-- Juanjo Marín
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]