Re: GNOME Board of Directors Foundation Elections Spring 2009 - Preliminary results
- From: Andy Tai <atai atai org>
- To: john palmieri <john j5 palmieri gmail com>
- Cc: GNOME Foundation Membership Committee <membership-committee gnome org>, Dave Neary <dneary gnome org>, foundation-list <foundation-list gnome org>, michael meeks novell com
- Subject: Re: GNOME Board of Directors Foundation Elections Spring 2009 - Preliminary results
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:38:59 -0700
Is it legal according to California law that the membership committee can decide the results?
Not sure if there is a way in the Charter to trigger a re-vote in case of dispute.
2009/6/25 john palmieri
<john j5 palmieri gmail com>
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Dave Neary
<dneary gnome org> wrote:
Hi,
The way forward seems clear to me - the membership committee decides what counting method will be used, announces it, and we count the election according to that means. There doesn't need to be a crisis here.
Deciding on the correct method after the elections seems a bit off to me. A member who voted should know exactly how their vote is going to be counted before the ballot is cast. If different methods reach different conclusions then that is a crisis because the membership committee would be free to choose the one which fits their agenda the most (not that I feel there is an agenda but the possibility leaves doubt on the validity of the results).
--
John
_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
--
Andy Tai,
atai atai org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]