Re: GNOME Board of Directors Foundation Elections Spring 2009 - Preliminary results

Is it just not a good year to have elections? :)


On 06/25/2009 12:30 PM, john palmieri wrote:

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Dave Neary <dneary gnome org
<mailto:dneary gnome org>> wrote:


    The way forward seems clear to me - the membership committee decides
    what counting method will be used, announces it, and we count the
    election according to that means. There doesn't need to be a crisis

Deciding on the correct method after the elections seems a bit off to
me.  A member who voted should know exactly how their vote is going to
be counted before the ballot is cast.  If different methods reach
different conclusions then that is a crisis because the membership
committee would be free to choose the one which fits their agenda the
most (not that I feel there is an agenda but the possibility leaves
doubt on the validity of the results).

If in fact it is a bug in OpenSTV and not a disagreement on how votes
should be counted then that is an acceptable reason to move forward with
certifying the vote.

If it is a disagreement on how votes should be counted then the vote is
flawed and I propose we have a runoff between the candidates who were on
one list but not the other.

Going forward we must make sure to document the complete procedure used
in detail and make sure it doesn't fluctuate from election to election.
I do suggest having test cases we can run through any software used to
guarantee results stay consistent from year to year.



foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list gnome org

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]