Re: GNOME Board of Directors Foundation Elections Spring 2009 - Preliminary results
- From: Filippo Argiolas <fargiolas gnome org>
- To: john palmieri <john j5 palmieri gmail com>
- Cc: elections gnome org, GNOME Foundation Membership Committee <membership-committee gnome org>, Dave Neary <dneary gnome org>, foundation-list <foundation-list gnome org>, michael meeks novell com
- Subject: Re: GNOME Board of Directors Foundation Elections Spring 2009 - Preliminary results
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:52:09 +0200
2009/6/25 john palmieri <john j5 palmieri gmail com>:
> Is it really fair if people can't agree on how it works? Seems to go
> against the GNOME principle of simplicity by adding more choices to fix some
> of the issues of voting. I'm all for making things more fair but I'm not
> sure the complexity actually fixes things or hides the issues under a layer
> of complexity. In any case the final decision should be well documented on
> how it was reached. If at all possible, done by hand showing the work at
> each step.
I'm not familiar with STV but I did read something here and there
within the past two days.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]