Re: Call for hosts for GUADEC 2009
- From: "Jonathon Jongsma" <jonathon quotidian org>
- To: "Ted Gould" <ted gould cx>
- Cc: GNOME Foundation List <foundation-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Call for hosts for GUADEC 2009
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:29:04 -0500
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Ted Gould <ted gould cx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 14:38 -0400, Adam Schreiber wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:34 PM, BJörn Lindqvist <bjourne gmail com> wrote:
> > > Usa isn't the only country in North America. Maybe Canada or Mexico
> > > has less strict rules about visas? It is not hard to imagine that the
> > > Americans might feel that it is a little unfair that guadec always is
> > > in Europe. Couldn't there be two conferences?
> >
> > I too would appreciate another North/Central/South America based
> > conference if GUADEC can't be moved across the pond occasionally.
> > However, I suspect that because the GNOME summit is held in Boston
> > every year we will have to make due.
>
> It seems to me that the Boston Summit should turn into the "Americas
> Conference" and leave GUADEC as the "European Conference". While I know
> that there are a lot of GNOME Folks in Boston, it would seem that moving
> it around the Americas would be reasonable.
>
> Now all we need is a cleaver acronym for it :)
But what if most of your regular collaborators are on the other side
of the pond? GNOME is a global project, and developers are not
organized into projects by geographic location. I think there's a big
benefit to having one 'official' conference where you know most GNOME
hackers will be attending. Having additional local sub-conferences is
great as well, but I don't see the benefit of having several competing
'main' conferences.
--
jonner
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]