Re: gnome-logos package

On 12/17/05, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 18:30 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> [snip]
> > Having a logo for a program which is a
> > "gnome program" and for "gnome developer" ought to be doable given the
> > right definition, and "foundation member" is definitely one that can be
> > done today as the foundation has a defined membership.
> We already have a GNOME member logo, or that start of one.
> There's also discussion in the wiki about (probably self-policing)
> certification requirements, though I think it's unnecessarily
> fine-grained.

The requirements for each and the process for each would have to be
formalized if we wanted to go this route, at least under US law.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]