About Ray's package and Luis Villa's post: http://tieguy.org/blog/index.cgi/524 I think the Foundation needs official logos owned by the Foundation to be used by the official GNOME projects in order to give consistancy to the GNOME brand. But I also think that we should make a more extensive use of the right to implement authorised modifications stated in http://live.gnome.org/LogoGuidelines . For instance, the GUADEC needs a logo, the foot is a good starting point but the word "GNOME" conflicts with "GUADEC", and a designer will have a hard time to come up with a cool proposal that fully keeps the original logo. And I definitely think we should encourage the community to express themselves with logo variations that will be clearly unnofficial but respected by the Foundation unless we find they are offensive or something, and then "we'll lart you publicly" (if you deserve it). I'm not sure about the legal implications of this (is this a "lesser" trademark license?), but from a marketing perspective sounds like the consistant and useful way to proceed. En/na Ray Strode ha escrit: > The reason I'm bringing this up is because gnome-screensaver has > recently gained a "floaters" screensaver that depends on having a > scalable version of the gnome-foot logo. -- Quim Gil - http://desdeamericaconamor.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature