Following the concerns about these statistics... En/na Federico Mena Quintero ha escrit: > So, www and planet *are* our most efficient vehicles for communication. Volume is not necessarely related to efficiency. Look at the most visited pages in November: http://www.gnome.org/stats/usage_200512.html#TOPURLS The first real page is the homepage, this is normal. But then... where do all these users go after hitting the homepage? Strictely in www.gnome.org (the "corporate" site) they go to three pages we mostly agree they are unnefficient: http://www.gnome.org/start/2.12/ (missing screenshots or the visual tour, mentioned in the marketing and gnome-web lists) http://www.gnome.org/about/ (being discussed in marketing, we agree that this page doesn't reflect what GNOME is about and needs a remake) http://www.gnome.org/softwaremap/ (a gift of hundreds of users to gnome-files) Which is weird is that the own stats page gets more hits than these. This fact makes me think that the whole stats may be altered by non-human processes. The following most visited pages are jdub and seth's blogs. Congratulations to them, but there is no merit for the wgo efficiency here. Most of the other hits come from the projects pages: Dia, Evolution, Gnumeric, Totem... Since there is no easy way to go from the homepage to the projects' subsites (nor to people's blogs) it is feasible to assume that they get their hits by their own merits. Also it is feasible to assume that most people landing in the homepage don't go much further (stats of user tracks page by page would be very useful). -- Quim Gil - http://desdeamericaconamor.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature