Re: Non-free software and GNOME (The conclusion)
- From: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- To: Rob Brown-Bayliss <on_the_net clear net nz>
- Cc: Foundation List <foundation-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Non-free software and GNOME (The conclusion)
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 23:43:22 -0500 (EST)
It would be wonderful if this discussion could be discontinued,
and we could go back to actualy writing Free(sic) software. So let me
fan the flames a tad ;-)
On 30 Oct 2001, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote:
> But first we need to get them here.
Lets pack the community full of people that don't share our
vision, or love of Free software - the more the merrier ! lets really try
and fill the community full of commercial developers who contribute
nothing to Freedom, dilute our ethic and distract us from producing a
fully Free system.
FWIW - I think it's only worth fighting battles worth winning, and
having some sense of issue priority; neither is true of the original issue
- and one has to support Christian. The whole thing has to be a joke
anyway, particularly with Star Office =~= Open Office, and the immensity
of Sun's contribution.
Regards,
Michael.
--
mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]