Re: Gnome speed
- From: George Farris <george gmsys com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Rob Brown-Bayliss <on_the_net clear net nz>, Foundation List <foundation-list gnome org>, Gnome List <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Gnome speed
- Date: 17 Nov 2001 10:51:46 -0800
But this doesn't make sense. Wasn't the report that a stock RH7.2 ran
faster than RH7.2 and Ximian? If so what does the kernel have to do
with it?
Cheers
On Sat, 2001-11-17 at 10:32, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> Rob Brown-Bayliss <on_the_net clear net nz> writes:
> > It's weird, but very definiate... As I said, then machine was very
> > usable before I installed rh7.2, but now it is 20-30% faster and I don't
> > think there is that much difference in the gnome features of rh and
> > ximian.
>
> It may be the kernel - early 2.4 kernels had hosed VM subsystems that
> caused the desktop to seem very unresponsive.
>
> Havoc
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-list mailing list
> foundation-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
--
George Farris - VE7FRG
George gmsys com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]