Re: Gnome speed

But this doesn't make sense.  Wasn't the report that a stock RH7.2 ran
faster than RH7.2 and Ximian?  If so what does the kernel have to do
with it?


On Sat, 2001-11-17 at 10:32, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Rob Brown-Bayliss <on_the_net clear net nz> writes: 
> > It's weird, but very definiate...  As I said, then machine was very
> > usable before I installed rh7.2, but now it is 20-30% faster and I don't
> > think there is that much difference in the gnome features of rh and
> > ximian.  
> It may be the kernel - early 2.4 kernels had hosed VM subsystems that
> caused the desktop to seem very unresponsive.
> Havoc
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-list mailing list
> foundation-list gnome org
George Farris - VE7FRG
George gmsys com

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]