Re: Attendance record of current board members
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Dick Porter <dick ximian com>
- Cc: foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Attendance record of current board members
- Date: 12 Nov 2001 16:32:13 -0500
Dick Porter <dick ximian com> writes:
> Without needing to go into details, I guess the notes about "Jim won't
> be able to make the next 2 or 3 meetings" cover this sort of thing, and
> he was listed in the regrets section following that.
>
> This is why I didnt include regrets in the % absent column.
At one point he gave regrets for a couple months, I'm not sure how it
was reflected in the minutes. It was a one-time deal though, for
medical reasons. Not something I expect to happen again, is all I'm
saying.
> Expecting 100% attendance is unrealistic. Maybe I'm misunderstanding
> the difference between missing and regrets? I'm assuming "missing"
> equates to "just didnt show up, no idea why".
Nope, you got it right. Regrets means we expected them to be absent in
advance because they sent an explanation. Missing means they just
didn't show.
> On the other hand, if someone finds for whatever reason that they can't
> find the time that they expected to then it's reasonable to consider
> this when voting for the next board.
Of course. In fact the board needs more people on it with time to get
things done.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]