Re: GNOME Foundation elections!
- From: Nat Friedman <nat helixcode com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Rusty Conover <rconover zootweb com>, Joe Shaw <joe helixcode com>, Daniel Veillard <Daniel Veillard w3 org>, Bart Decrem <bart eazel com>, foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME Foundation elections!
- Date: 27 Sep 2000 00:54:39 -0400
Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> writes:
>
> What kinds of vulnerabilities are you thinking of when you say
> "trustable host"? Of course gnome.org is secure to the best of our
> knowledge, but if you want cryptographic guarantees or the like, it
> probably isn't.
Cryptographic guarantees seem like overkill to me. The guarantee is,
a user can view the public list archive and make sure that his mail
corresponds to what he meant to vote.
Nat
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
