Re: GNOME Foundation elections!

Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> writes:
> What kinds of vulnerabilities are you thinking of when you say
> "trustable host"? Of course is secure to the best of our
> knowledge, but if you want cryptographic guarantees or the like, it
> probably isn't.

Cryptographic guarantees seem like overkill to me.  The guarantee is,
a user can view the public list archive and make sure that his mail
corresponds to what he meant to vote.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]