Re: Final list of candidates for the GNOME Foundation elections
- From: Bart Decrem <bart eazel com>
- To: Alan Cox <alan lxorguk ukuu org uk>
- Cc: John Sullivan <sullivan eazel com>, foundation-list gnome org, Russell Steinthal <rms39 columbia edu>
- Subject: Re: Final list of candidates for the GNOME Foundation elections
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:21:43 -0700
I agree that one person should resign but I don't think we should do interim
elections unless there's a special circumstance that requires us to do so. So my
preference would be to have the board appoint an interim board member until the
next elections.
The reason is that, as we are learning, organizing elections is actually very
costly in terms of total resources invested in it. If we're 7 months into a
board cycle (and 5 months away from the next elections), I'm not relishing the
thought of organizing elections for the purpose of replacing one person.
The charter currently allows for this possibility, although it doesn't dictate
it.
Bart
Alan Cox wrote:
> > What happens if people who are elected to the board later move around from
> > company to company such that more than 4 of them are at the same company?
>
> I would suggest one of them resigns and there is a new election for that post.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-list mailing list
> foundation-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]