Re: Fwd: Draft of Proposal for the GNOME Foundation.
- From: Alan Cox <alan lxorguk ukuu org uk>
- To: nat helixcode com (Nat Friedman)
- Cc: kelly poverty bloomington in us, foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Fwd: Draft of Proposal for the GNOME Foundation.
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 22:21:57 +0100 (BST)
> But remember, this is all (at least, in my proposal) part of a virtual
> global entity. I don't see why it would be subject to any of these
> laws.
The US arm is and any money so raised. Likewise the EU arm is subject to tight
data protection law and controls on its money. Law tends to follow the money
which is another reason for technical bodies to have none
- They arent worth sueing
- They are harder to threaten - no 'We'll withold our payment'
- They arent tangled in the legalities of donations and
valid use
If its a non entity money wise then its only obvious entanglement is
cartel/monopoly issues. I'd rather not have people thinking 'but a 4 week
delay like the gtk+ team want means XYZ vendor misses their gold cd deadline
and they'll pull out $12K of funding' when making decisions about code
quality.
Alan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]