Re: Minutes of the GNOME Foundation Board meeting 28 November 2000
- From: Christopher James Lahey <clahey helixcode com>
- To: Jim Gettys <jg pa dec com>
- Cc: Chema Celorio <chema celorio com>, George <jirka 5z com>, Bart Decrem <bart eazel com>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Russell Steinthal <rms39 columbia edu>, Daniel Veillard w3 org, foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Minutes of the GNOME Foundation Board meeting 28 November 2000
- Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 10:57:22 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Jim Gettys wrote:
> Independent of malace, I am most skeptical about stability as you run
> up to releases: it may be that open commit most of the time will work to yet
> signficantly larger scale, but I'm quite dubious that open commit all of the
> time up to date of release will continue to work. Statistically, this
> seems unlikely as the project grows.
One important thing that has helped in the past is branching for stable
releases. This doesn't prevent malice, but it does a great job at
preventing accidental destabilization.
> At a minimum, I believe we must work to have an ACL mechanism in place,
> as the day, unfortunately, WILL come. Sigh...
If we do this, I hope that we leave it off at first and have strong
discussions again before we turn it on.
Thanks,
Chris
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]