Le jeu 17/04/2003 à 20:06, Jim Gettys hp com a écrit : > Here's the issue about running fc-cache... > > "fc-cache" by itself should have been sufficient to cause just the > affected cache files to get redone. > > But prior to fontconfig 2.2 (about to be released), on some systems > (including my laptop), there has been a bug such that the right cache > files don't get computed/written when they should. I believe Keith thinks > this bug has been fixed. > > The workaround prior to 2.2 is to execute a "fc-cache -f" to force > redoing *all* of the cache files. This can be time consuming on systems > with lots of fonts, but it at least works reliably, so that installed > fonts actually appear. > > "fc-cache -V" will tell you fontconfig's version number. Ideally (presuming > the bug is really dead), you'd check the version number, and only run > with the "-f" option if you see old versions of fontconfig. Well, this doesn't help a lot, current RedHat Raw Hide fontconfig package is at 2.1.9 but fc-cache -V gives 1.0.2. I guess they didn't see fit to patch -V like they did the rest of fontconfig. So fc-cache -V is not terribly useful on RH systems. I've never seen this bug on RH. However the fc-cache command is already in the spec file, if you think -f is worth it adding it is trivial. Do you want me to do it/send the resulting rpms somewhere ? Obviously I won't post them on a mailing list. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=