Re: back to an old problem
- From: Jack <ostroffjh sbcglobal net>
- To: f-spot-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: back to an old problem
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 21:01:41 -0400
Well, I'm finally getting back to spending some time trying to get
this to work, still with no luck.
I do not find libgtk-win32 anywhere. As I said, it is mapped in the
gac to libgtk-x11, which is in /usr/lib/.... Should there be a copy of
it in /usr/local/lib/f-spot? That directory has lots of .dll files,
some with an associated .mdb and some with a .config. The only .so in
that directory is libfspot.so. However, both FSpot.Gui.dll.config and
Hyena.Gui.dll.config include a line mapping libgtk-win32-2.0-0.dll to
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.
Any suggestions on further troubleshooting would be greatly appreciated.
Jack
On 2015.03.29 15:47, Matthieu Nguyen wrote:
I recall having a problem with a dll like that because it was somehow
copied to the bin folder without a .dll.config to go with it, so in
the end F-Spot was trying to load the .dll from the
/usr/local/lib/f-spot/ folder which was missing the .config linking
to the proper .so, rather than taking the lib from the gac.
Check what you have in your /usr/local/lib/f-spot folder, just in
case...
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Jack <ostroffjh sbcglobal net> wrote:
As I said in the other thread, I have gotten f-spot from git-head to
compile, but I still get a dll not found error on
libgth-win32-2.0-0.dll. This seems odd, because that library is in a
dllmap in the gac for both gnome-sharp and gtk-sharp, both pointing
to target="libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0" which exists in both /usr/lib32 and
/use/lib64, and is loaded before, and is searched in both before and
immediately after the error, if I run f-spot with
MONO_LOG_LEVEL=debug.
>
I've found this error referenced in a few bug reports (f-spot and
other apps) but no definitive solution, just claims that something
wasn't installed correctly. It seems as if neither of those two
dllmap entries is being read. I could try putting it explicitly in
f-spot.exe.config, but I don't know if that's really a good solution
for the long run, or just a quick work-around.
>
> Any thoughts or suggestions?
[Date Prev][
Date Next] [Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]