Re: Please, continue evonving f-spot

[Heiner <list heinrich-muenz de>]

+1

And for me image versioning is a must, too! At this time, shotwell is
quite o.k. for a few hundred cellphone jpgs, but not for work with huge
photo collections.

Heiner

Am Freitag, den 12.08.2011, 15:34 +0100 schrieb Graham White:
> And for me.
> 
> Graham
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 03:05:04PM +0100, Dougie Nisbet wrote:
> > On 12/08/2011 14:32, Josep Cols wrote:
> > >
> > >For me, it's not true. I can't migrate to Shotwell because Shotwell 
> > >has only 1 level of tags.
> > >
> > >On my collection, I have about 40.000 photos and 2.000 tags: if tags 
> > >are on a 'linear' structure, it's very dificult to find the exact tag.
> > >
> > >For me, the tree structure of f-spot tags are a must.
> > >
> > yup. same here. Hierarchical tagging is a must-have for me too.
> > 
> > Dougie
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > f-spot-list mailing list
> > f-spot-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
> _______________________________________________
> f-spot-list mailing list
> f-spot-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list