Re: ufraw (and others) integration

[Stephane Delcroix <stephane delcroix org>]

Nice sugestions. Patches are welcome...

s


On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 22:36 +1000, Tim Thomson wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I'm liking the way things are going with RAW processing recently, I
> think I might be about to make a full switch back from digikam.
> 
> Just a couple of issues I've noticed, Pentax's .pef and .dng
> extensions aren't in the IsRaw function so it won't shell out to
> ufraw. (src/Imaging/ImageFile.cs line 218). I'm guessing there are
> probably a few other ufraw supported RAW filetypes missing?
> 
> Also, I think raw.Uri should be escaped when shelling out to ufraw so
> that if a picture name has special characters, or someone opts to not
> copy files when importing the call to ufraw will still work.
> (extensions/DevelopInUFraw/DevelopInUFRaw.cs, line 35 perhaps?)
> 
> The PEF RAW thumbnails are not displayed in the main browser, though
> the DNG files are. From a quick look at the source it looks like this
> is handled by the gnome libs, so I guess once I upgrade gnome it might
> start working? It's interesting that they work fine in nautilus
> though...
> 
> It'd be nice to have f-spot not block when calling ufraw with this
> extension, so you could still look at your other photos while
> developing to compare, but I guess that would be pretty tricky
> currently.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Tim.
> _______________________________________________
> F-spot-list mailing list
> F-spot-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
>