RE:f-spot vs gallery2

["Tim Morozzo" <tim morozzo co uk>]

They are totally different in every way! gallery2 works server side and
f-spot works locally and relies on a pre-configured website. I guess if you
want more control over how your site looks go with gallery2, if you just
want to upload quickly and aren't too interested in personalising the design
aspect of your site use f-spot combined with picasaweb or something similar.

I suppose the way to get the best of both worlds is to combine the 2 (f-spot
locally uploading to gallery2)

Tim

www.morozzo.co.uk


Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 16:08:43 +0100
From: Timothy Murphy <tim birdsnest maths tcd ie>
Subject: f-spot vs gallery2
To: f-spot-list gnome org
Message-ID: <200707071608 44142 tim birdsnest maths tcd ie>
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="us-ascii"

Could someone please tell me the advantages and disadvantages
of f-spot as opposed to gallery2 for setting up a slide-show on a web-site,
please.

-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland