Re: [evolution-patches] Hidden agendas and Soft Targets [Was: Re: Warning fixes]

[Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>]

On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 15:31 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:

Hey Harish, thanks for taking the responsibility to hook-up with the
discussion.

> I appreciate your concerns on "Novell's staffing problems"  and what
> Novell should do - but IIRC, we last agreed together that  a branch
> would be created for the Camel work based on mmap and you could use the
> Evolution Two Ten Planning page to discuss and invite contributions to
> that.

> The mmapped-camel-summary branch *was* created,  Jeff and Varadhan had
> been discussing the pros/cons and further work ahead with you - but I do
> not see a single patch on the branch yet.  

I had/still have the impression that Jeffrey was going to commit it to
that branch after he made his personal corrections to it? If not, I can
definitely commit my own patch to it. I was told to wait for what
Jeffrey was going to commit ...

-- A little bit confused now --


-- 
Philip Van Hoof, software developer
home: me at pvanhoof dot be
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
work: vanhoof at x-tend dot be
blog: http://pvanhoof.be/blog