Re: [evolution-patches] This patch removes some compiler warnings (on gcc 4.0)
- From: Philip Van Hoof <spamfrommailing freax org>
- To: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- Cc: spamfrommailing pvanhoof be, Evolution Patches <evolution-patches lists ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] This patch removes some compiler warnings (on gcc 4.0)
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 13:04:39 +0200
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 16:15 +0530, Not Zed wrote:
Any reason why you're getting warnings on those? I would've imagined it would only happen if libxml was compiled with 16 bit xmlChar, but that will break more than just a few warnings ?
Or is it just an unsigned char vs signed issue?
I think it's simple unsigned char vs singed issue. Gcc 4.0 is a little bit more pedantic about warning about it, I guess.
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 21:36 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
Mainly (xmlChar*) casting for libxml . . .
--
Philip Van Hoof, Software Developer @ Cronos
home: me at pvanhoof dot be
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
work: philip dot vanhoof at cronos dot be
junk: philip dot vanhoof at gmail dot com
http://www.pvanhoof.be/
|
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
