Re: [evolution-patches] Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fix forbuilderrorin e-utils

["Not Zed" <notzed ximian com>]

On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 11:15 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 14:56 +0530, Not Zed wrote:
>
> > Hmm, why does this not  build?
>
> > It is like that very speficially so that all of the profiling code can
> > be completely removed from the compilation, rather than just calling a
> > dummy function.
> > 
> > Any fix should maintain this behaviour, so this one isn't suitable.
>
> As a gcc 4.0 user the line in the c-file is giving me a syntax error. In
> the c-file it isn't showing an incorrect syntax whatsoever. 
Any chance of dumping the whole error here?

> Wouldn't it then be better to wrap the entire function in the #ifdef-
> #endif clause and wrap the line where the function is called with it
> too?
>
> In which case the function isn't compiled if profiling isn't enabled. As
> will the calls to that function also not be compiled.
This isn't acceptable.  We plan to put in potentially hundreds of these calls, and wrapping every one in a #ifdef#endif is just not going to cut it!