Re: [evolution-patches] fix for bug #33933 (message-list sorting)

[Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj novell com>]

I think it does affect it (seems to for me but I didn't do any actual
timing).

We'll probably have to come up with a different hack to make it faster
at some point, but the mechanism this patch removes is no longer viable.

Jeff

On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 10:48 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> 
> Does this affect sorting performance, or does etable implicitly cache
> such sorting?
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 15:31 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > This should probably go into 2.0.x as well...
> > 
> > The problem was that back in 1.4 when we sued different MessageList
> > objects per folder, I had implemented a sorting optimisation that
> > cached
> > the collated keys for each subject string (and sender/to/etc - which
> > is
> > odd because the sorter didn't actually use those, but ah well).
> > 
> > Anyways, now that we reuse the same "view", this hack no longer
> > works
> > and in fact causes problems (as seen in the report).