Re: [evolution-patches] fix for bug #33933 (message-list sorting)

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

Does this affect sorting performance, or does etable implicitly cache such sorting?


On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 15:31 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
>     This should probably go into 2.0.x as well...
>     
>     The problem was that back in 1.4 when we sued different MessageList
>     objects per folder, I had implemented a sorting optimisation that cached
>     the collated keys for each subject string (and sender/to/etc - which is
>     odd because the sorter didn't actually use those, but ah well).
>     
>     Anyways, now that we reuse the same "view", this hack no longer works
>     and in fact causes problems (as seen in the report).