Re: [evolution-patches] fix for bug #42854, same but different

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 09:20, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> well, you *could*... but then we'd sort multiple times (the idea is that
> you call this in a loop to generate the next set starting where we left
> off the previous call)

Why?  there's plenty of ways to stop this happening (e.g. only sort if
the first uid == 0).  also even sorting multiple times wouldn't be a big
hit ...