Re: [evolution-patches] fix for bug #42854, same but different

[Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>]

well, you *could*... but then we'd sort multiple times (the idea is that
you call this in a loop to generate the next set starting where we left
off the previous call)

Jeff

On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 19:47, Not Zed wrote:
> could also do this in imap_uid_array_to_set, which is the function which
> requires the data ordered.
> 
> but looks fine as is too.
> 
> On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 14:30, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > same fix as 42854, but for other entry points. A few of the functions I
> > added sorting to probably don't need it, but it doesn't hurt and it
> > ensures there aren't any issues that go unseen due to an unsorted list
> > of uids.
> > 
> > Jeff
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Evolution-patches mailing list
> Evolution-patches lists ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-patches
-- 
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
fejj ximian com  - www.ximian.com